Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal staff members have up until February 6 to choose whether to willingly leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be permitted to depart and be paid up until completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is a work attorney who represents federal workers as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s delayed resignation program would really mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I really don’t consider it so much a deal. I think it’s a request to resign with an unclear promise that, potentially, you could be kept in administrative leave status for as much as 8 months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some people have actually been utilizing the term buyout to describe what this is due to the fact that there seems to be the deal of administrative leave for as much as eight months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would definitely not describe it as a buyout. I believe that’s a very misleading term to use in this circumstance. When you consider a buyout, there’s normally some sort of composed arrangement or a concrete deal to offer a benefit in exchange for waiving particular rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your suggestions, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is workout severe caution. There are no guarantees included in this e-mail. The only thing I can tell you for certain is that if you change your mind, the agency’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some classification of worker who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most mindful due to the fact that leaving earlier than planned can have serious effects, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed reporters that this is a bargain for individuals who don’t wish to return to the workplace. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a recommendation to federal workers that they need to return in – to work. And if they do not, then they have the option to resign, and employment this administration is really kindly using to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in a manner, it breaks my heart that federal staff members are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it’s designed to get folks who work truly tough to resign. I think it’s attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of people’s eyes due to the fact that there are no warranties. And these are individuals who enjoy their job. They enjoy the objective of the company. They strive. And right now, they’re dealing with extremely tough choices, particularly if they’re remote. I mean, it’s extremely coercive.MARTIN: You say it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who resides in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. or else we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you anticipate legal difficulties just to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be honest, is so extraordinary that I believe a lot of us are still trying to find out what to do with it. I’m not exactly sure if the offer itself might be challengeable. I believe the larger question is the execution of these terms. I’m not knowledgeable about any authority that exists today for OPM to order companies to offer this number of people administrative leave. So I believe it is quite perhaps the stage for difficulties due to the fact that I feel OPM has actually vastly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: employment That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment lawyer with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights scheduled. Visit our site terms of usage and employment authorizations pages at www.npr.org for more details.

NPR records are developed on a rush due date by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its final kind and may be updated or modified in the future. Accuracy and accessibility may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s shows is the audio record.