
Nycnewsly
Add a review FollowOverview
-
Founded Date March 4, 1904
-
Posted Jobs 0
-
Viewed 17
Company Description
This Stage used 3 Reward Models
DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese artificial intelligence business that develops open-source large language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the business in 2023 and acts as its CEO.
The DeepSeek-R1 model provides responses equivalent to other contemporary large language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a considerably lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of an equivalent LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI designs were established amid United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were intended to restrict the capability of these two nations to develop sophisticated AI systems. [6] [7]
On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its first free chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had exceeded ChatGPT as the most-downloaded totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share cost to come by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success versus larger and more established competitors has been referred to as “upending AI”, [8] constituting “the first shot at what is emerging as an international AI space race”, [11] and ushering in “a brand-new period of AI brinkmanship”. [12]
DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, designs, and training information open-source, allowing its code to be easily readily available for use, modification, watching, and creating documents for constructing functions. [13] The business apparently strongly recruits young AI researchers from top Chinese universities, [8] and works with from outside the computer science field to diversify its models’ understanding and abilities. [3]
In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading because the 2007-2008 financial crisis while attending Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on establishing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer solely utilized AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative synthetic intelligence chatbot open source, implying its code is freely readily available for use, modification, and viewing. This includes permission to access and use the source code, in addition to style files, for constructing purposes. [13]
According to 36Kr, Liang had actually developed a store of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip constraints on China. [15]
In April 2023, High-Flyer began a synthetic general intelligence laboratory dedicated to research study establishing AI tools separate from High-Flyer’s monetary organization. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the investors, the lab became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Venture capital companies hesitated in supplying financing as it was unlikely that it would be able to create an exit in a short time period. [15]
After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which provided strong performance for a low price, DeepSeek ended up being referred to as the driver for China’s AI model cost war. It was rapidly called the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the price of their AI models to complete with the business. Despite the low cost charged by DeepSeek, it was rewarding compared to its competitors that were losing money. [20]
DeepSeek is concentrated on research and has no in-depth strategies for commercialization; [20] this also allows its technology to prevent the most stringent arrangements of China’s AI policies, such as requiring consumer-facing innovation to abide by the federal government’s controls on info. [3]
DeepSeek’s working with preferences target technical capabilities rather than work experience, leading to a lot of new hires being either recent university graduates or developers whose AI professions are less developed. [18] [3] Likewise, the company hires people with no computer science background to help its innovation comprehend other subjects and knowledge areas, including being able to generate poetry and carry out well on the notoriously challenging Chinese college admissions examinations (Gaokao). [3]
Development and release history
DeepSeek LLM
On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is available free of charge to both researchers and business users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an additional license contract (“DeepSeek license”) concerning “open and responsible downstream usage” for the design itself. [21]
They are of the same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series includes 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]
1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of direction data. This produced the Instruct models.
They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]
On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek launched the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B criteria in both Base and Chat kinds (no Instruct was launched). It was developed to take on other LLMs offered at the time. The paper claimed benchmark outcomes greater than the majority of open source LLMs at the time, specifically Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the model was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the model itself. [27]
The architecture was basically the same as those of the Llama series. They used the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text obtained by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]
The Chat variations of the 2 Base designs was likewise released concurrently, obtained by training Base by supervised finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]
On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B specifications (2.7 B activated per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the like DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared comparable efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variant of the standard sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared specialists” that are constantly queried, and “routed professionals” that might not be. They discovered this to assist with skilled balancing. In standard MoE, some experts can become excessively depended on, while other experts might be rarely used, wasting specifications. Attempting to stabilize the experts so that they are equally utilized then triggers experts to reproduce the same capacity. They proposed the shared specialists to learn core capabilities that are often used, and let the routed professionals to learn the peripheral capabilities that are rarely used. [28]
In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math models specialized for doing math: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]
1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following design by SFT Base with 776K math problems and their tool-use-integrated detailed solutions. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The benefit design was a procedure reward model (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd approach. [30] This reward design was then utilized to train Instruct utilizing group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K math questions “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The benefit model was constantly upgraded during training to avoid reward hacking. This led to the RL model.
V2
In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series consists of 4 designs, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 bigger models were trained as follows: [31]
1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This resulted in DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for safety. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in two phases. The first phase was trained to solve math and coding issues. This stage used 1 reward model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The 2nd phase was trained to be helpful, safe, and follow guidelines. This stage utilized 3 reward models. The helpfulness and security reward designs were trained on human choice information. The rule-based benefit design was by hand set. All trained benefit models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the released variation of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.
They chose for 2-staged RL, since they found that RL on reasoning information had “unique qualities” various from RL on general data. For example, RL on reasoning might improve over more training steps. [31]
The two V2-Lite models were smaller sized, and experienced likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to assist “further research study and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]
Architecturally, the V2 models were significantly customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They changed the standard attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head hidden attention (MLA), and utilized the mixture of specialists (MoE) alternative formerly released in January. [28]
The Financial Times reported that it was less expensive than its peers with a rate of 2 RMB for every single million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]
In June 2024, they launched 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]
1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were utilized to generate 20K code-related and 30K math-related guideline data, then combined with a direction dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for math problems was calculated by comparing to the ground-truth label. The reward for code problems was generated by a benefit model trained to anticipate whether a program would pass the system tests.
DeepSeek-V2.5 was launched in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]
V3
In December 2024, they released a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat design DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is basically the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]
1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mostly English and Chinese. It contained a higher ratio of math and programming than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of thinking (math, programming, reasoning) and non-reasoning (creative writing, roleplay, easy concern answering) information. Reasoning information was created by “professional models”. Non-reasoning data was produced by DeepSeek-V2.5 and checked by humans. – The “professional models” were trained by starting with an undefined base design, then SFT on both data, and artificial data produced by an internal DeepSeek-R1 model. The system timely asked the R1 to show and verify during thinking. Then the professional models were RL utilizing an unspecified benefit function.
– Each expert design was trained to generate simply artificial thinking data in one particular domain (math, programming, reasoning).
– Expert models were used, rather of R1 itself, because the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, bad format, and extreme length”.
4. Model-based reward designs were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference data including both last reward and chain-of-thought leading to the last benefit. The benefit design produced reward signals for both concerns with objective but free-form responses, and concerns without unbiased responses (such as imaginative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both benefit models and rule-based reward. The rule-based reward was computed for math issues with a final answer (put in a box), and for programming problems by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.
The DeepSeek team performed substantial low-level engineering to achieve effectiveness. They used mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was carried out in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the standard 32-bit, requiring special GEMM routines to build up accurately. They utilized a custom 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They minimized the interaction latency by overlapping thoroughly calculation and interaction, such as committing 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU communication. They reduced interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the precise device each professional was on in order to prevent specific makers being queried more frequently than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing methods. [37]
After training, it was deployed on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]
Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 outshined Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]
R1
On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being available by means of DeepSeek’s API, as well as through a chat user interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for logical reasoning, mathematical reasoning, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek declared that it exceeded efficiency of OpenAI o1 on benchmarks such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal stated when it used 15 issues from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached a solution faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]
On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek released DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company likewise launched some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, but instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, including LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial data produced by R1. [47]
A conversation between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant fixes it. The assistant initially believes about the thinking process in the mind and then offers the user with the answer. The reasoning process and answer are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning process here address here. User:. Assistant:
DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained specifically utilizing GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they utilized no model-based reward. All reward functions were rule-based, “generally” of two types (other types were not defined): accuracy benefits and format rewards. Accuracy reward was checking whether a boxed response is appropriate (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for programs). Format benefit was examining whether the design puts its thinking trace within … [47]
As R1-Zero has issues with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to deal with these concerns and further improve thinking: [47]
1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” data all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the same RL process as R1-Zero, but also with a “language consistency benefit” to encourage it to react monolingually. This produced an internal model not launched.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking information from the internal design, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the produced thinking had an incorrect final answer, then it is gotten rid of). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning data (writing, factual QA, self-cognition, translation) utilizing DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic information for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based benefit (for reasoning jobs) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.
Distilled models were trained by SFT on 800K data manufactured from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar method as step 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]
Assessment and responses
DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually gone beyond ChatGPT as the highest-rated complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot reportedly answers questions, resolves logic issues and composes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the marketplace, according to benchmark tests used by American AI business. [3]
DeepSeek-V3 uses significantly less resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as lots of as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to have required only about 2,000 GPUs, particularly the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta invested constructing its most current AI innovation. [3]
DeepSeek’s competitive performance at reasonably minimal expense has been acknowledged as possibly challenging the worldwide supremacy of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik minute” for American AI. [49] [50] The efficiency of its R1 model was apparently “on par with” among OpenAI’s newest designs when used for tasks such as mathematics, coding, and natural language reasoning; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley venture capitalist Marc Andreessen also described R1 as “AI’s Sputnik moment”. [51]
DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media widely praised DeepSeek as a national possession. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang welcomed Liang Wenfeng to his seminar with experts and asked him to supply viewpoints and tips on a draft for remarks of the yearly 2024 government work report. [55]
DeepSeek’s optimization of limited resources has actually highlighted potential limitations of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, that include export limitations on innovative AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI models as a result “sparked market turmoil” [57] and triggered shares in significant global technology companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of competing Broadcom. Other tech firms also sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip equipment maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A global selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 model, had resulted in record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, an overall of $1 trillion of value was rubbed out American stocks. [50]
Leading figures in the American AI sector had blended responses to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are included in the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “very impressive”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, consisting of Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk revealed skepticism of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various business, consisting of Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are seeking to use the model in their program. [68]
On 27 January 2025, its new user registration to contact number from mainland China, email addresses, or Google account logins, following a “massive” cyberattack interrupted the correct functioning of its servers. [69] [70]
Some sources have actually observed that the main application programs interface (API) version of R1, which runs from servers found in China, utilizes censorship mechanisms for subjects that are considered politically delicate for the federal government of China. For example, the model refuses to respond to concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might at first create a response, however then erases it shortly later on and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my current scope. Let’s speak about something else.” [72] The incorporated censorship mechanisms and restrictions can only be gotten rid of to a minimal extent in the open-source version of the R1 design. If the “core socialist values” specified by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are terminated. [74] When evaluated by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 explained Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and mentioned: “We strongly oppose any kind of ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist activities and are committed to accomplishing the total reunification of the motherland through peaceful means.” [75] In January 2025, Western researchers were able to deceive DeepSeek into giving specific answers to some of these subjects by asking for in its response to switch particular letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]
Security and personal privacy
Some professionals fear that the federal government of China could utilize the AI system for foreign influence operations, spreading disinformation, security and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy terms and conditions state “We keep the information we gather in secure servers found in the People’s Republic of China … We might collect your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you provide to our design and Services”. Although the data storage and collection policy is consistent with ChatGPT’s privacy policy, [79] a Wired short article reports this as security issues. [80] In response, the Italian data protection authority is looking for additional details on DeepSeek’s collection and use of individual data, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had actually started a national security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s federal government prohibited making use of DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security premises and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a questions into DeepSeek’s use of personal information. [83]
Artificial intelligence market in China.
Notes
^ a b c The variety of heads does not equivalent the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview required selecting “Deep Think allowed”, and every user could use it just 50 times a day.
References
^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s inexpensive, open AI model DeepSeek delights scientists”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world ready to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s less expensive models and weaker chips call into concern trillions in AI facilities costs”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may strike India’s AI ambitions”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia examination signals widening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you must know”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to slump?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a leading Chinese AI design conquered US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the original on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI leader”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at primary · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at main”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at primary”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model outperforms Meta, OpenAI items”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, outperforms Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s new AI design appears to be one of the best ‘open’ oppositions yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: releasing supercharged reasoning power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s first thinking design R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs by means of Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI startup DeepSeek overtakes ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has actually reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik minute’: $1tn rubbed out US stocks after Chinese firm unveils AI chatbot” – via The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek presents an obstacle to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock thrashing, Graphika says”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI company’s AI model breakthrough highlights limits of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot sparks US market turmoil, cleaning $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek triggers international AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of value”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “extremely excellent”: “We need to take the developments out of China extremely, extremely seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek design ‘remarkable'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – through NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman praises: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s disturbance”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘concerns’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests massive Nvidia GPU facilities”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS customers, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek hit with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek temporarily restricted brand-new sign-ups, mentioning ‘large-scale malicious attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually triggered a $1 trillion panic – and it does not care about complimentary speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We experimented with DeepSeek. It worked well, up until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on an international AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the rise of chaos”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, providing the AI race its ‘Sputnik minute'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI poses powerful cyber, data personal privacy dangers”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts advise care over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has painted a substantial TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator seeks details from DeepSeek on data protection”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House evaluates impact of China AI app DeepSeek on national security, authorities states”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.